|
|
|
|
|
|
by nix23
2148 days ago
|
|
|
>Hot spring bacteria won’t survive the arctic and vice versa. No but can adapt, any discussion about it is just plain stupid, the chance is small but give the mass of chances over time it's not that small anymore, you know like intelligent life on another planets. |
|
|
It can't adapt if it is killed off by the initial conditions.
> the chance is small but give the mass of chances over time it's not that small anymore
The likelihood of a lifeform surviving such a trip and seeding a new planet even once is, in my opinion, incredibly small.
But panspermia doesn't mean, "this happened one extremely lucky time because there were so many attempts over the eons the universe has been around." It means that this is the means by which life regularly spreads across the cosmos.
It's important to note that each of these numbers is teeny tiny and small. You need lots and lots and lots and a lot more lots of separate chances to reach something approaching certainty. Your units probably need to be life-bearing rocks/ice, not individual bacteria. Although more bacteria means it is likelier to survive the trip and thrive in the presence of enough resources, most of the filters on this trip (say smashing into a star) take out the whole rock, not just a few unlucky bacteria on that rock.
I'm much less skeptical of life spreading this way within a star system and of the molecules of life being formed in the cosmos and then seeding planets (i.e., molecular panspermia).