|
|
|
|
|
by IvoDankolov
2147 days ago
|
|
Well, all of supervised learning is basically approximating an unknown function from a finite list of samples. But it's still an approximation, with things like e.g. backpropagation 'simply' (in the abstract mathematical sense) tweaking weights in the direction of the derivatives to get closer to expected values. The vast majority of machine learning just builds on that by going deep (more layers), automatically generating inputs (e.g. in game AIs playing against themselves), etc. One might argue that's even worse than function optimisation as you can only vaguely guess at the target and thus all your validation is suspect and you have to prove it using humans by, for instance, beating them at Starcraft. |
|