|
|
|
|
|
by kgwgk
2148 days ago
|
|
> 2. The approach I'm used to of having negative numbers in the debits and positive credits. This makes all the double accounting balancing much simpler. But I can see it may confuse some people when assets are negative. So, if people were able to overcome their confusion, would you have balance sheets written like this? $ in millions
ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Cash and Short Term Investments -133546 Deposits 117756
Other Assets -859422 Other liabilities 784947
------------ ------- ----------------- ------
Total Assets -992968 Total liabilities 902703
Shareholders' equity 90265
==================== ======
Total liabilities
and shareholders' equity 992968
If you really want to change the signs in one of the sides, so instead of getting the same totals they sum to zero, it would make much more sense to do it the other way: keep assets positive and let liabilities be negative (as other commenters have suggested). $ in millions
ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Cash and Short Term Investments 133546 Deposits -117756
Other Assets 859422 Other liabilities -784947
------------ ------ ----------------- -------
Total Assets 992968 Total liabilities -902703
Shareholders' equity -90265
==================== =======
Total liabilities
and shareholders' equity -992968
But one property of the usual presentation is lost: equity is no longer equal to net assets (which are $90265mn). You would need to change the sign of equity when considering it as an asset. |
|