|
|
|
|
|
by pengaru
2145 days ago
|
|
> UCSF, the paper author, consider HFCS to be a poison and likely explains why there was no obesity in 60's photos I presume you're referring to Dr. Lustig of UCSF's research on sugar, or more specifically his position that fructose is a toxin akin to ethanol due to how similarly they're processed by the liver. If so, Dr. Lustig is careful to point out that this is not an HFCS-specific issue. Sugar and HFCS both contain fructose, and are essentially identical in this regard. This kind of misinformed demonizing of HFCS results in people thinking sweets are perfectly safe as long as they contain sugar and not HFCS, UCSF does not back such a position AFAIK. |
|
HFCS has replaced fat as the basis of many processed foods because corn is subsidized in the US.
As a result, the majority of Americans are obese from eating pounds of HFCS weekly.