|
|
|
|
|
|
by opus132
2147 days ago
|
|
|
> in the same way that a C program linked against glibc is not a derivative work of glibc I believe this is only as a result of the linking exception; I don't know if this has ever been tested, but my understanding was that linking (either statically or dynamically) against a library was generally considered enough to be a derivative work. |
|
|
Legally people can't decide which form of linkage count as deriving and if the linkage form even matter, but static linking with LTO is most times seen as causing a derivative to be produced.