Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by BurningFrog 2161 days ago
I am sometimes tempted to tell colleagues "well I've done this professionally since before you were born, so...", but so far I've resisted the temptation. Hope I can keep the streak going :)

Even if you're right, it's not a great argument, because there isn't really a rational counter argument.

5 comments

If the argument is only based on having more experience - the "I've done this professionally since before you were born" argument - it can be correctly rejected as an argument from authority fallacy.

If the argument is based on a pattern you've seen before that's germane to the situation at hand - the "I've seen this movie before and it ends with regret and a data breach" argument - it can be much more convincing.

> I am sometimes tempted to tell colleagues "well I've done this professionally since before you were born, so..."

This sounds like you want the respect due to age alone.

The respect due to age alone is horrible. I wouldn't inflict it on my worst enemies.

The respect due to age and experience, on the other hand, is substantial, and something to strive for.

Back up your gray hairs :) with some relevant knowledge and the intelligent people will listen attentively.

> "well I've done this professionally since before you were born, so..."

This sounds like something coming from the advanced or expert beginner:

https://daedtech.com/how-developers-stop-learning-rise-of-th...

You don't influence by pulling the seniority card, you do it with data. If there isn't data to back up your suggested approach being better, it might not be, and you get to learn something new!
Well, often the data is conclusions from my decades of experience. It's not like I can show that in Wikipedia.

What I actually mostly do is saying "Doing X never works, because Y, instead I like to do Z because...", and it has reasonable success.

People want to hear it can work.
Sourcing data is expensive. I think it's best not to underestimate just how much development has to be done based upon gut feel, trust or experience simply because proving it would take too long.

If it's two people arguing their own opinions at each other and neither one has relevant data where exactly do you go from there? The one with 2 years experience or the one with 15?

Sometimes the data is the experience, and it's hard to dump your personal experience on someone and make them ingest it. Sometimes you've tried approach X a couple of times and it always failed, but you don't have a scientific proof it will fail again. You just know from experience if you do X it usually ends up in tears and all-nighters and missed deadlines. Not because you have an Excel table proving it, but because you've lived it.
"Historically this has turned out badly" and back it up.