[onion2k]

Having watched the video it looks like the expectation is that the recruiters would define tests. I've worked with a lot of recruiters and very few would be able to write a coding test well.

Also, it doesn't look like the recruiter has any opportunity to check that their test is correct, and there's no way for the candidate to test their solution works, so if there's any issue with the way the test has been defined (eg the test was created using a signature of input:string -> string by mistake) the candidate simply can't pass. If I was taking that test and failed because the test software was incorrect I would not give the company I was applying to a second chance. Applying for a job is stressful enough without that sort of thing happening.

Lastly, as a suggestion, I'd add a feature to search StackOverflow for the function the user has entered. There'll be a lot of cases where that happens.

[mrrusof]

I just re-read this. I've got one clarification: checking correctness of questions before creation is not there yet but candidates can check their solutions during the test. Because I'm recruiting the first users, I'm creating questions for them and making sure everything works. Automating this is in the roadmap.

The StackOverflow check is a very good idea. A plagiarism feature is in the roadmap too.

I cannot thank you enough for taking some time to answer the way you did.

[mrrusof]

Thanks