|
|
|
|
|
by waon
2154 days ago
|
|
This seems like FUD. How are the laws itself “excess and absurd” compared to rest of the democratic world? It’s also strange to assert Japan has “strong privacy laws” when the exact opposite is happening in this very article we’re discussing. > In Japan, the person who committed the (sexual) crime can reliably sue you for ruining their reputation and win Unfortunately, this is not an uncommon thing outside of Japan [1]. And to be fair, you can’t just put a blanket ban on defamation lawsuits because it’s not wrong to sue for defamation if the allegation of sexual misconduct is in fact false. I don’t believe the majority of them to be the case, but ultimately, it’s for the courts to decide. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/12/arts/defamation-me-too.ht... > Stating actual plain facts about a person that harms their image on any public platform will land you in trouble, unless it’s something that’s clearly in the public interest to know Whoa. This the whole point of having defamation laws. Would you rather live in a world where every embarrassing details about your life can be published online? |
|
Defamation laws normally deal with disseminating false information, not embarrassing information. True statements cannot be defamatory in many/most legal systems, no matter how much they harm someone's reputation.