[bmelton]

That depends on so many factors really, but it's common to see money go into an option pool (that dilutes everybody's stock) as well as a fixed percentage go into the pool (which dilutes YC shares as well) -- meaning that if Sequoia comes in afterward and takes 20%, it dilutes the ownership shares that I have, as well as the ownership stake YC has.

The important bit is that they're in it just like the founders are -- if the founders get diluted, YC gets diluted. If the founders go broke, YC goes broke. If the founders make money on an exit, or a liquidity event, then so does YC.

You can argue all day long about 6% being 'greedy', or 'predatory' or whatever you like, but from what I understand, the value they add far exceeds the amount they take, and means that they're invested in your success.

[WarPaul]

I don't see YC's 6% as being greedy or predatory at all. It's just different economic theory.

What PG did with YC is LEGENDARY. He was the first and will go down in history as one of the most pivotal figures in the entrepreneurial economy. The best explanation I've heard on YC's value add (or TechStars, etc.), is that it's like bringing on another co-founder, which makes perfect sense - as does your explanation above.

Looking forward to seeing future entrepreneurs continue to benefit from great program's like YC, TechStars, MC, etc.

[scbailey]

No one has mentioned that you can be a part of YC and still apply to MassChallenge. Why not do both and get even farther ahead? MC doesn't require you to be in Boston, so it's in your interest to place multiple bets.

[bmelton]

That has been mentioned actually, and there are requirements to be in Boston for some parts of MassChallenge.