|
I fail to understand this article. It seems to wobble between "don't eat out, you'll propagate infection to others," which, yes, social distance good, disease transmission bad. But most of the article seems to suggest something like: "when you eat out, you put us, your service staff, at risk." Uhm... quit? Normally I'd say something like, "most people can't afford to just quit," but no one can afford to pay you to stay home, either, so what exactly is the author proposing? |