|
|
|
|
|
by xqzv
2159 days ago
|
|
How out of touch can you be? So her company facilitates equity for tech workers, an industry whose goal is to 'disrupt' all other job markets. They justify this by claiming to empower individual workers. Her unique justification is to empower women in tech specifically. She does not acknowledge that her company will benefit from this decrease in demand for labor, which will also affect women. She does not consider the countless women in legacy jobs that tech has eliminated, who stay at those jobs even after sexual harrassment, never mind filing suit (something that almost no one except serial executives is equipped to do). Not to mention her completely unfalsifiable claim that the things she was fired for demonstrate sexism following from nothing other than the fact that she is female. So she posts a hybrid call-for-cancellation and job posting, so she can hopefully get back to work disrupting asap. |
|