|
|
|
|
|
by dgb23
2152 days ago
|
|
Simplicity is described as being "disentangled" or the opposite of complexity. I personally often picture complexity as a graph of nodes and edges: - The more edges you add, the more complex the thing it describes. - The more rules you can deduce about the graph (for example "it is a unidirectional circle-like") such as the flow of the edges, counting etc. the less complex it is. The imagery in the talk describes it similar: Complexity is more knotted and interwoven. Simplicity is more straight-forward, clear and composable. Ease is described as something being "near", also in the dimension of time. Something you already know or can learn/do quickly. The talk goes on describing how simplicity requires up-front investment and time to achieve and also how ease and simplicity sometimes overlap and when they are at odds. |
|