Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fastball 2153 days ago
I actually have a plan for this!

I want to build a ratings website where you rate things in the same way they generally structure psychological tests, by responding to affirmative statements with something between "strongly agree" and "strongly disagree".

As an example, if you were rating films, questions could be:

"This film was enjoyable."

"This film had an engaging plot."

"The acting was believable / appropriate for the film."

etc. Ideally you'd have about 5 standard statements that you respond to for a particular thing you want to rate (whether its films, books, food, or a university course).

Better than a star rating system, because the problem with stars is that you end up with scores that always hover from 5-8 (if out of 10) in a very not useful way (see IMDB).

It's also better than what RT / Netflix / many others have moved to (just voting with up/down) as those require a lot of data in order to really give interesting results, where as with this system you can start to find interesting insights almost immediately, or within a single person's own collection.

1 comments

I like this - in general, I’m a fan of this (my job is survey research). There are many different approaches to getting better results than most reviews get. Personally, I’d love to see a max-diff approach to reviews.
Feel free to steal the idea! I'm a bit busy building out another idea I had haha.