[CydeWeys]

> I'm saying the lecture style of this class is sufficiently ineffective that I don't see how it's worth anyone's time to watch.

Again, you're incorrectly extrapolating from your minority view and making global statements about how it's not worth anyone else's time. This lecture style is very effective for most people and is absolutely worth their time. Witness how highly rated the class is, and how successful it is at drawing people in to the major.

> The style definitely doesn't work for me.

That is a fair statement. But saying it's not worth anyone's time absolutely isn't, and is directly contradicted by the fact that this class is in fact highly successful, well-rated, and does a good job of accomplishing its goal of introducing people to the field.

[bachmeier]

> and does a good job of accomplishing its goal of introducing people to the field

That's exactly the point. The goal is not to help students to learn the material at a deep level. It's to recruit students to CS. I'm not even sure what the disagreement is at this point, so I'm going to step away.

[kyawzazaw]

but you were pointing out its flaws in achieving a different objective ("learning deeply")