|
|
|
|
|
by johannes1234321
2155 days ago
|
|
First mistake: you calculate 6 weeks of dev time ignoring that SAP got 11.5M including maintenance for 2 years. Certainly amount of work in two years time is lower than initial dev work, but not zero. Secondly you are only taking in "development work", but such a contract entails other things
- certainly there is a penalty if they deliver too late
- there is legal risk to cover, if they deliver crap in some legal sense they are liable
- probably SAP had other contracts which they had to postpone
- count in all the lawyers writing the contract :-D And yes, they certainly made a profit out of this and yes a proper biding procedure might be better, but given the timelines and the transparency I think it's ok. |
|
Let‘s assume another million for lawyers „writing the contract“. It‘s still far off.
Additionally let‘s remember the 20 million is just for the development. It does not include running the thing. That‘s what the other 50+ million are for.
I don‘t agree. I run a business myself. I charge plenty. I know how much DAX size companies charge as well. The numbers don‘t add up, and this is especially true for something that could have been done pro bono by SAP in the current situation where pretty much everyone tries to do whatever they can.