|
|
|
|
|
|
by lwhi
5560 days ago
|
|
|
I don't believe the system does hide posts. It creates differentiation between low ranking and high ranking posts. I rarely ignore the comments at the bottom of a page - in fact, sometimes the least interesting comments are those that are highest ranked. What's the difference between having upvote / downvote buttons and agree / disagree buttons? |
|
|
But although the system never makes posts inaccessible (to do so would, I'm sure, elicit complaints of "censorship"), it does, if you're using a normally configured browser, grey out negative-voted comments so that they require deliberate effort to read (by -4, you need to highlight them with the mouse). It moves lower-voted posts down the page: even if you have time to read every post, which many people don't, you probably lose focus and pay less attention by the time you get down there. And it reduces the karma of people who make downvoted posts, which some people probably care about (e.g. because they lose/don't get the ability to downvote) and some people probably don't, but which is clearly intended as discouragement.
I think it's clear that the system is designed with the assumption that posts that get downvoted are posts that it intends to discourage. (And I think it's agreed for purposes of this discussion that spam and useless comments are deserving of discouragement in a way that comments one happens to disagree with are not.)