Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by m0zg 2159 days ago
No argument there. But at least he's a "smart engineer". Holmes wasn't even that.
2 comments

No, she wasn’t. She was a fraud from top to bottom — but she still convinced investors, powerful people, and talented engineers to invest in her, defend her, and join her company. She’s morally bankrupt but her lack of engineering acumen isn’t related to that.

Levandowski is morally bankrupt too — and sloppy when it came to covering his tracks — the fact that he’s a brilliant engineer doesn’t make his actions more palpable.

Both are bad people and I’m not comfortable giving a guy a pass just because he was smart. Ultimately, he was just as greedy as Holmes. He wasn’t satisfied with the nine figure payouts both from Google and Uber (and his Uber money could have exceeded ten figures depending on stock options) and had to go for even more.

Fuck that guy. Fuck Elizabeth Holmes too, but Fuck Levandowski.

If you honestly think that being smart on some dimension that you personally think is particularly virtuous is some sort of get out of jail free card, you might want to re-think your ethics.
Who is saying that being a smart engineer makes it OK?

But at least they are a smart engineer, unlike <some one else I do not know about>

I think you've tried and failed to read my mind. Don't try that in the future. It never works, and it makes you look dumb.