[fapjacks]

What you've done here is demonstrate why Cloudflare cannot be trusted: You do not get to decide for the rest of the internet which use cases are valid and which are "bonkers" -- you probably just thought to yourself "Oh, but I did". This is a pattern of behavior at Cloudflare (cf. Cloudflare CEO waking up one morning to remove a domain from the internet because he didn't like the contents -- which is a polite way of saying he caved to the Twitter mob). You and Cloudflare made a business decision that supporting the DNS standard was too costly, despite DNS being a core offering of Cloudflare. You appear to be saying that you personally made a value judgment about someone else's use case, used that as an argument to drop support for the standard, then pushed draft changes so that Cloudflare could retroactively claim to support the standard.

You have forced changes in the DNS standard based on your own personal value judgment, and Cloudflare was duplicitous in its support of this relative moral position. I could not have made the argument against trusting Cloudflare better, myself.

[majke]

> You and Cloudflare made a business decision that supporting the DNS standard was too costly,

No, I made a decision that it was time to fix an obscure feature that was impossible to use correctly, and caused real damage to the internet - see firefox ANY saga.

Fun fact. We kept on supporting ANY until the RFC was ratified.

> You have forced changes in the DNS standard based on your own personal value judgment

No, we worked on the standard in the working group. I'm not the one assigning RFC numbers. This is a process.