|
|
|
|
|
by hogFeast
2168 days ago
|
|
This isn't Economics...I tried to explain this in my first post. Marxist history != Marxism. They overlap significantly but most economic history until the 1990s was Marxist because it emphasised economic determinism (and, in fact, a lot of economics these days is Marxist in this sense too). The implications of economic determinism are slightly more complex (even Lenin did not completely buy it) but it is different from the layman's understanding of Marxism. To give you an example, Adam Tooze (who has written a ton of very good books on economic history) is a Marxist historian. |
|