Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jjuel 2160 days ago
That would be great if children under 14 then didn't have any interaction with anyone over the age of 14. So while it is good that kids are not dying at the same rate as others it doesn't mean they shouldn't be tested or doing the same things everyone else is to prevent the spread.
1 comments

It's kind of odd.

People will get all upset over a report of a squirrel with bubonic plague, even though they never come anywhere near squirrels. Or they will hide because a raccoon walks through their yard in the daytime and they are afraid of rabies (even if they live in western Washington, where there has never been a known case of rabies in raccoons...). (The reason the raccoon is out in daytime is most likely that she has babies at home and needs to gather more food than she can with just her usual nocturnal foraging).

But children...which we actually allow to get close to us, even going so far as letting them into our buildings and vehicles? Meh.

Plague and rabies are much more deadly diseases. Plague kills about 10% of victims with the best treatment, and rabies can be vaccinated against post-infection but is basically unsurvivable once symptoms start.