[eru]

It's not so much about the algorithm, but the parsing itself.

Parser combinators give you one of the most straightforward ways to express parsers.

You are right, that the language you express your parser combinators in vs the language you express an alternative solution in also will have an impact.

You can in theory express parser combinators in Python. But it's gonna be a bit ugly, because Python has relatively clunky syntax for functions.

Some people have tried writer parser combinator libraries for eg JavaScript. See https://github.com/GregRos/parjs

I just found a parser combinator library for Python https://pypi.org/project/parsita/ But it looks like they have to abuse some Python magic to make the code readable.

[enriquto]

Alright, but jpeg decoding is nearly all algorithm, there's almost no parsing. Do you have a particular haskell jpeg decoder in mind that uses parser combinators?

[eru]

No. But the author of the original comment mentioning Haskell https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23841865 might have had?