> So your counterpoint is that the call to genocide was one he relayed directly from the president of the USA?
I presented no counterpoint, I've pointed out the fact that you're basing your accusations on claims that are patently wrong, if not intentionally false and disingenuous.
And while on the topic of disingenuous statements, please revise your sources because the Cambodja bombing campaign does not come close to fit the definition of genocide.
The "I was only following orders" defense did not fly at the Nuremberg trials.