|
|
|
|
|
by danans
2171 days ago
|
|
Plenty of Indians/Hindus conduct the same sort of linguistic analysis, beginning with a guy called Panini who lived around 800 BC. In any case, the nuance and depth of the arguments in the University of Texas article far supercedes the a priori (and apparently religiously nationalist) statements you are making here. Historical linguistics is an evidence-based field of study that many Indian scholars also actively participate in, wherein they also analyze non Indian languages. |
|
I don’t understand why this has to become rude and hostile now. I don’t believe I have anything more to say to you.