|
|
|
|
|
by stoksc
2172 days ago
|
|
I just spent 5 minutes typing this up only to see your post.. thank you for also noticing. The other point made from this source (about permanent lung damage) is also wrong. I don’t see sources for the other numbers. I agree never closing the economy would’ve been a total disaster. But the math here is bad. |
|
But looking at the US numbers it seems that you got the worse outcome of lockdown/no-lockdown. Economical hit, plus number of cases are back on the rise due to people not isolating properly.
One could argue that for US lockdown was a mistake. Or at least very costly move to delay/prepare for peak infections.