[Dowwie]

Have you evaluated Tantivy/Toshi as possible alternative to ES? I only ask because of your native use of Rust. PGX seems like a more robust offering than pg-extend-rs. This is a great addition to the community!

Also, v.0.0.3 doesn't create much confidence about stability! I'll keep an eye on the project and wish the team the best.

[zombodb]

re: v0.0.3 -- sure. I just published it last night.

We've been working on it since November last year, and have now fully ported ZomboDB to it.

It's proving out nicely, but keep in mind that Postgres' internals are infinitely complex. Getting safe wrappers around all its "things" is going to take a very very long time.

I'd rather get something that seems very stable now, and continue to iterate on it over time.

[ragerino]

I think the comment was less about your code but rather about your v0.0.3 version number. I guess a v0.99 would imply more stability.

That's why lots of companies have switched to date based versioning, similar to Ubuntu and others.

[zombodb]

I've looked into them. It seems they're designed to work within a single process, and it's not quite clear to me how sharing the underlying data files across postgres backends (even with proper Postgres locking) would work.

That's not say they aren't good frameworks. I'm sure they are. It just seems like they're designed for different use cases.

That said, I have other ideas on this front that I can't talk about today. ;)