Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tarjei 2167 days ago
We do this all the time. Our tests run against SQLite (I use Mariadb in prod).

Each parallel testrun gets its own path in /dev/shm/xx so everything is in ram as well.

1 comments

If you're using SQLite, why the indirection of an in-memory filesystem rather than SQLite's in-memory database feature?
Not the person you're asking this, but N connections to sqlite :memory: backend results in N separate database instances.

This can be worked around in some scenarios, but not always & reliably. Most importantly, you can't reach the same in-memory database from multiple processes.

https://www.sqlite.org/inmemorydb.html