|
|
|
|
|
by halbersa
2171 days ago
|
|
One of the authors here, I can't exactly deny that line was added to sound impressive, so guilty as charged. However the savings are much higher than $20/day for a few reasons: * Many tasks run on expensive instances (hardware acceleration, Windows) * We have OSX/Android pools that run on physical devices in a data centre (these are an order of magnitude more expensive than Linux) * There are ancillary costs. For example each task generates artifacts which incur storage costs. These artifacts are downloaded which incur transfer costs. * There are also overhead costs (idle time, rebooting, etc) that aren't counted in the 10 years / day stat. All these things see a corresponding decrease in costs with fewer tasks. |
|