|
|
|
|
|
by S33V
2166 days ago
|
|
Not the original commenter, but what I'm taking from it is that the notion of land ownership was/is foreign to indigenous people. Given that, using the term native land can be misrepresenting native history. I'm not sure what the alternative verbiage would be to describe an area has inhabited by an indigenous tribe. Urban Native Era, a pretty large Native movement/brand, holds the slogan "You Are On Native Land" and I believe they are holding themselves to a pretty high standard of racial sensitivity. |
|
It's difficult to come to an objective conclusion because so much of what's believed and reported about native culture is often done through appropriate by the descendents of European settlers, rather than the natives themselves, and a lot of mythologizing, fetishizing and stereotyping has taken place over the years as a result. One should at least be wary of sweeping "just so" truisms about historically oppressed people.
Anecdotally, I was able to find some evidence to the contrary[0], and I would expect the actual truth to vary according to tribe.
[0]https://daily.jstor.org/yes-americans-owned-land-before-colu...
[1]https://mises.org/wire/did-indians-understand-concept-privat...