|
|
|
|
|
|
by jonfw
2167 days ago
|
|
|
They're attempting to paint this advice as coming from experts- but without attaching names, we're relying solely on the credibility of the author from the NYT. Given the incentive structure of being an internet blogger (sensationalism = $$$$), that credibility is very limited. Science is much more rigorous than this article- but it's a fun read. |
|
|
You mean these names? They're linked in the article.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa939...
They're credible enough and this action public enough that the WHO got the message: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/health/coronavirus-aeroso....
> we're relying solely on the credibility of the author from the NYT. Given the incentive structure of being an internet blogger (sensationalism = $$$$), that credibility is very limited.
The NYT isn't a blog.