|
|
|
|
|
by idrios
2177 days ago
|
|
So had they been complying with govt data requests from Hong Kong up until 5 days ago? I have no idea what China's policies on ex post facto laws are but does this mean there are political dissenters in Hong Kong who will likely be punished for this new security law based on info given to them from these companies just 2 weeks ago? Don't get me wrong, I'm extremely grateful these companies are taking this stand. But I'm so frustrated that it's always a reactive measure. Would they have still done this if the law hadn't gotten this much international attention? Are these companies actually doing this because it's the right thing to do, or because they would suffer a PR storm if they didn't? I wish these companies would have been more proactive about doing something to support the people of Hong Kong because this is literally the first news I think I've seen, in the entire 1.5 years of the ongoing protests, where a major US company actually did something to help them. |
|
- https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/overview
- https://transparency.facebook.com/government-data-requests
- https://transparency.twitter.com/en/information-requests.htm...