Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ctdeneen 2177 days ago
But for most situation you encode once and play multiple times. Wouldn't it be better to reduce storage and bandwidth costs with a smaller file (assuming the same quality)?
1 comments

It's a trade off. When I have a batch of 40 videos and encoding h264 takes 20 minutes per video and h265 takes 4 hours means the difference between 13 days and 160 days.

The latter isn't practical, I'll eat the couple hundred MB in order to save a lot of time.

I think by "13 days and 160 days" you mean "13 hours and 160 hours".