|
|
|
|
|
|
by teruakohatu
2174 days ago
|
|
|
From a game theory perspective it seems very risky to give young people an incentive to be infected. When people have tangible benefits from having antibodies, a subset of the population is sure to "aquire" them. With those complex rules (have antibodies but use an inhaler means you are banned), would it not just be better to have everything online? |
|
|