Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rasz 2175 days ago
In the Norwegian case it turned out refurbishing company was the one printing additional Apple logos on _non Apple_ parts of the display.

Its one thing to refurbish a display by gluing replacement glass on original LCD. Its another to then plaster the glass part with Apple logos and fake serial numbers.
1 comments
class4behavior 2174 days ago
>refurbishing company was the one printing additional Apple logos on _non Apple_ parts of the display.

Where did you get this? There is no such thing mentioned in the verdict nor any reporting. The closest you can find is one of the prior cases the court references where a fishery tools seller used logos of another company.

link
rasz 2174 days ago
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6936580/Norway.pd...

The screens were real Apple hardware, with newly reprinted Apple logos by someone in China.

point 20 "Høgsterett legg difor til grunn lagmannsrettens vurdering av at dei innførte skjermane ikkje er originale, at dei påførte varemerka er identiske med Apples registrerte figurmerke, at varemerka ikkje er påførte av Apple, og at dei er dekt over med tusj som let seg fjerne. "

+ the fact he was billed for "Original OEM screens"

link