|
|
|
|
|
by longtom
2178 days ago
|
|
Could someone with GPT-3 beta access try whether it can better solve 3 digit addition when it is allowed/encouraged/forced to make intermediate results explicit? E.g. instead of 21 + 110 = 130 150 + 12 = condition it on 21 + 110 = 100 + 10 + 20 + 1 = 100 + 30 + 1 = 131 150 + 12 = or similar. Given that humans make these intermediate steps in their heads GPT may perform better when it is encouraged to do them as well. This may in fact apply to all sorts of reasoning, but in many cases it may be difficult to make these steps explicit in text form. Humans seem to mainly use some prediction layer or scratchpad which also contains the inner monologue but also motor primitives, smells, images, everything. Humans can decide to think a bit longer before producing an output, which appears to require an RNN. |
|
PROMPT ======= Input: 21 + 110 Output: 100 + 20 + 10 + 1 = 100 + 30 + 1 = 130 + 1 = 131
Input: 89+78 Output: 80 + 70 + 9 + 8 = 150 + 9 + 8 = 150 + 17 = 150 + 10 + 7 = 160 + 7 = 167
OUTPUT ====== Input: 37 + 112 Output: 30 + 100 + 10 + 2 = 110 + 1 = 111
Input: 91+11 Output: 100 + 90 + 1 = 190 + 1 = 191