[mst]

> This is pretty clearly "gender-conforming trans good, icky weird attention-seeking trans bad".

That's a reductive view and doesn't fit with my understanding of their position.

> Sorry, forming coalitions with people that seek to divide a marginalized community rather than work towards unity and solidarity is not a good idea.

I'm the one suggesting unity and solidarity here.

You're the one suggesting dividing people based on your guesses as to their motivations.

But, whatever. I'm going to keep working towards a world where "trans people choosing bathrooms most suitable for the gender they are commonly perceived to be and everybody else accepting that trans people just need to pee" is just an obvious and comfortable thing and nobody gets beaten up for doing that.

You keep doing ... whatever it is you're doing. If you ever decide that trans people not getting the shit kicked out of them matters more to you than ideological purity, we can pick the conversation up again then, I guess.