|
|
|
|
|
by crocal
2177 days ago
|
|
Actually no. Cannot be too big and automatic. You need to allow a stranded car to break free. You must not crush a car that is only half way in. Sigh. Railway crossings are pure evil. There is no fail safe design that I know of without adding a proximity sensor inside the car (I am a railway signalling engineer). Would love to be wrong though. |
|
Confirmation comes from observation by a signaller or crossing operator either directly or by CCTV, or automatically by LiDAR and radar. These crossings tend to be used in areas of heavy road, pedestrian or rail movements, and when train speeds may exceed (from memory) 100 mph / 160 km/h.
Their disadvantage is additional installation, maintenance and operational costs. They must also be closed for longer before a train arrives than an automatic half-barrier crossing to allow for the required safety checks and ensure that signals are cleared far enough along the line that approaching trains do not need to slow down.