|
|
|
|
|
by raghava
2175 days ago
|
|
> I would call them terrorists, mafia or fascists - the Indian word is Naxal/Urban Naxal. Pray enlighten the rest of us as to how the current regime favouring one particular corporation isn't fascism? Where is this definition of "urban naxal" defined? Just because one thought so? If speaking against the atrocities of authorities is being "urban naxalism", most of the current leaders also did so, during the emergency in India.
Is there a Retired/Erstwhile "Urban Naxal" title too, for them? Please keep HN civil. Your ultra-right thoughts can find good currency on Twitter/Reddit. HN being invaded by ultra-right, on a thread that talks about caste-based discrimination. Guess it is enough Internet for one day! |
|
India has been democratic for more than 70 years. I say picking up guns to disrupt civil society with an intent to capture power through violence is not Activism.
That is the recipe of fascism.
And "emergency" is by definition a suspension of democracy.