|
|
|
|
|
by couradical
2175 days ago
|
|
I actually think that the tax treatment differs as well - the 2 months free can be treated as a marketing expense, whereas the reduced rent simply results in the lower revenue. For financed buildings it also keeps the nominal value of the building at the same level - it's still technically "rented" for the same rate, keeping future cash flow projected the same. |
|