First, the article starts with a misleading report on a Facebook drone. There's nothing in the above summary about that.
Second, much of the article is about the eagerness of journalists to cover Facebook. Again, the above summary says absolutely nothing about that.
Third, the article talks about Facebook cultivating relationships with journalists or writing articles itself. Surprise, surprise, the above summary says nothing about that either.
Then there's a large part of the article on Facebook security measures to track down leaks. Once again, the summary doesn't even hint at that.
Yet another example is discussion of Facebook's reactive strategy, in which Facebook responds to bad press but does not proactively do anything to address issues before they come to light in the media. And, once again, the summary says nothing about that.
Saying that Zuckerberg is contemptuous of Facebook's users and that even he thinks they shouldn't trust him is actually not a summary of the article at all. It might be related, but touches on NONE of the concrete points the article makes.
Tons of stuff.
First, the article starts with a misleading report on a Facebook drone. There's nothing in the above summary about that.
Second, much of the article is about the eagerness of journalists to cover Facebook. Again, the above summary says absolutely nothing about that.
Third, the article talks about Facebook cultivating relationships with journalists or writing articles itself. Surprise, surprise, the above summary says nothing about that either.
Then there's a large part of the article on Facebook security measures to track down leaks. Once again, the summary doesn't even hint at that.
Yet another example is discussion of Facebook's reactive strategy, in which Facebook responds to bad press but does not proactively do anything to address issues before they come to light in the media. And, once again, the summary says nothing about that.
Saying that Zuckerberg is contemptuous of Facebook's users and that even he thinks they shouldn't trust him is actually not a summary of the article at all. It might be related, but touches on NONE of the concrete points the article makes.