|
|
|
|
|
by csharptwdec19
2183 days ago
|
|
> It wouldn't be the most maintainable stack, but the barrier to entry is pretty minimal, and that makes it worthwhile. I still don't know whether that's really true. On one side, there's the observation I've made with low-code (having been at an org and bailing right around the time they started going down that road;) When I was at the 'free training' (just a sales pitch) most of the people there were from other medium to large size companies, a couple of those companies multinational. B/c the sales pitch I've seen isn't to startups; it's to bigger orgs. It was actually pretty disturbing to listen to the sales rep explain as developers would leave through attrition/disgust at the product they could be replaced by 'non coders.' No, it wasn't exactly said like that but the sentiment was understood by all the developers (not managers) in the room. Okay, so lets say that they clean up their sales act (lol) and actually start to go towards smaller business. Those business are still going to wind up with a product that may or may not be maintainable long term, but are now guaranteed to be paying yearly licensing costs. No thx. |
|