[banneduse3r]

The biggest benefit is market manipulation and collusion.

What better than to run a "news site", know what your users (who many are C levels, or VC projects by YC) are watching and how and when they are commenting. By running that, they can glean an impressive amount of proprietary information.

YC can also control the narrative. "Voting ring detectors", shadowbans, blacklist names on articles all have a real and a hidden reason. And with no transparency, how do we know what they're doing and why?

And did you know there's a secret YC-founder only feature. founders funded under YC can see each other as orange usernames. The rest of us.. Well. They can collaborate publicly as a bloc but the rest of us are none-the-wiser.

[dang]

Sorry to ruin a good spy story but no one at YC is "gleaning" such information from HN, other than as casual readers looking at the same stuff everyone else sees.

Also sorry, but there are no hidden reasons. Here's why: we don't do things that aren't defensible to the community in the first place. That way when questions come up, we can answer them publicly in good conscience. Maybe the answers won't convince you (though we can dream!) but I believe that the bulk of the community does find them convincing, because if they didn't we'd never hear the end of it. Occasionally we screw up and do something that the community strongly dislikes, but in that case the solution is clear: say sorry and stop doing it.

The voting ring detector prevents abuses like people upvoting their own or friends' posts. Shadowbanning is mostly for new accounts that show signs of being spammers or trolls; if an account has an established history, we say that we're banning it and explain why. I don't know what "blacklist names on articles" means but anything like that would have an easily explainable reason too.

There's plenty of transparency in the sense that there's no question people can't get an answer to if they simply ask. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... We answer such questions every day, just like I'm doing here, though you didn't ask.

Sinister terms like "market manipulation", "collusion", "control the narrative" are impossible to answer because they don't mean anything specific. If you or anyone were to spell out exactly what you mean by them, it would be easy to clarify what we do and don't do, and why.

YC founders don't collaborate as a bloc on HN and the same anti-voting-ring and other anti-abuse measures apply to them as to all users. pg added the orange usernames in the early days of HN and YC, as a way to help the early YC community get to know each other. It's a perk, for sure, but more a kind of flair than some sort of secret power.

Have I missed anything?

[greenyoda]

> By running that, they can glean an impressive amount of proprietary information.

Anything that's posted by a company's founders in a public forum can hardly be considered "proprietary information". Anyone in the world can read anything on HN as easily as Twitter, Reddit, etc.

[gruez]

Votes aren't public afaik, so there's that.

[znpy]

> YC can also control the narrative

This. I've been noticing a lot of flagging lately.

[RandomBacon]

I've seen a couple of popular posts removed from the front page.

The last one was criticizing Apple.

[dang]

Sure, HN is a curated site. Posts get removed from the front page all the time. This can be because of user flags, software action, and/or moderator action, in any permutation.

Edit: we don't moderate HN based on who is being criticized or praised, be it Apple or anyone else. If you're noticing stories criticizing Apple getting removed, you're probably a critic of Apple. If you were a fan of Apple, you'd notice stories praising Apple getting removed. I call this the notice-dislike bias (crappy name, but I don't know a better one): https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que.... This bias dominates people's perceptions of HN to such an extent that I don't think I've ever seen a single counterexample.

[znpy]

Yep, but it feels a lot more "curated" lately.

[dang]

People have such feelings based on things that they've recently noticed, but it is almost always randomness, or perhaps seasonal fluctuations like the rise of a major ongoing story (the George Floyd-related topics like protests and policy brutality are the current one, covid before that and still ongoing, and so on). Those are random too in the sense that HN is bobbing in the waves of much larger trends. The way we operate the site itself hasn't changed.

[dang]

Flagging is done by users.

[ykevinator]

I wonder

[dang]

What exactly do you wonder?

Moderators sometimes turn flags off. Moderators also sometimes put [flagged] on comments, though that's rare. But if you see [flagged] on a story, that's because users flagged it.

[gruez]

>And did you know there's a secret YC-founder only feature. founders funded under YC can see each other as orange usernames. The rest of us.. Well. They can collaborate publicly as a bloc but the rest of us are none-the-wiser.

Can't you do this on any forum by having your co-conspirators install some sort of a userscript/userstyle? I guess it's more convenient to do it on the site yourself if you own it, but it's not exactly that much of a competitive advantage.

[woodandsteel]

>The biggest benefit is market manipulation and collusion.

Your claim would be more persuasive if you gave us a few specific examples.

[krapp]

seems legit.