Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by azangru 2182 days ago
> Why didn't they just improve the Linux version.

You know, write once, run everywhere. It's programmer's dream :-)
2 comments
0xDEEPFAC 2182 days ago
Write once, run poorly everywhere. It's a lazy programmer's dream ; )

https://medium.com/commitlog/electron-is-cancer-b066108e6c32

link
deeter72 2182 days ago
It really has to be laziness since the Qt framework is widely supported on Linux.
link
nimrody 2182 days ago
The funny thing here is that this is no small startup with limited resources.

Microsoft can have dedicated teams for each platform (perhaps Linux is not as important but certainly for Windows, macOS, android and iOS)

link
holidaygoose 2182 days ago
It might also be an issue with motivation. Would you want to work on something that's basically a clone, so there's no creativity but purely porting + solving annoying platform-related bugs? You'd probably tolerate it for a bit, but then it's just playing catch up all the time. It seems like a recipe for employees trying to switch away to another team or company.
link
0xDEEPFAC 2182 days ago
They did it for control and convenience at the expense of literate computer users.

The Windows 10 UI is written in TypeScript, Edge is chrome, Chrome is chrome, Safari is chrome - it makes hiring and training easy when you can just make every API a grey gelatinous chunk of ECMA script with hamburger menus. It also means the "app" is always sandboxed unable to do powerful things like universal push-to-talk.

The color and joy of using programs has been flattened out in the name of consistency.

link
holidaygoose 2182 days ago
Oh yeah but I was talking about motivating the developers. I think it might be challenging to hire people who just work on porting.
link