|
|
|
|
|
by burfog
2187 days ago
|
|
There was no switch. Go look up members of congress who switched political party during that era. Wikipedia has a list. You'll find two, one in the house and one in the senate. Had there been an actual switch, you'd expect to see numerous members of congress switching sides. The "party switch" narrative is a lie. It's to cover for the fact that the republicans kept voting for civil rights until they were finally able to pass it. Today, being the party in opposition to civil rights wouldn't be seen as OK, so a false version of history is pushed to cover up the truth. A better explanation for the change in voting is that party preferences changed once the issue of civil rights was no longer under consideration. With that gone, other political goals were able to determine party preference. |
|
Framing this as the civil rights act being solved and now voters focusing on other issues is ahistorical, and essentially just propaganda.
That's what the mean by a party switch.