|
|
|
|
|
|
by cmdshiftf4
2187 days ago
|
|
|
> In this particular case I think it goes beyond a mere mistake. I think that supports another point made above: >At a certain point, when the gaffes all line up in one direction, one might reasonably suspect an underlying motive. The NYT seems to be beyond "gaffes" at this point, and be entirely focused on promoting their ideology. |
|
|