[masklinn]

> Very confusing, this definitely needs another syntax

The entire point of structural pattern matching is that structuring and destructuring look the same.

> This syntax goes against Zen: It’s implicit -- when using match case expressions don't mean what they regularly mean.

There's nothing implicit to it. The match/case tells you that you're in a pattern-matching context.

> I’m a big believer in this feature, it just needs some other syntax. Using {} instead of () makes it a lot better. Now no way to confuse it with simple equality.

Makes it even better by… looking like set literals and losing the clear relationship between construction and deconstruction?