[s_y_n_t_a_x]

So Twitter is a private company and can do whatever it wants but when it comes to FB making decisions about free speech we need to force them into submission?

If you don't like it, move to another platform, isn't that what you guys always say? :)

[derp_dee_derp]

the person you responded too didn't mention anything about twitter and you seem to be chasing straw men.

[s_y_n_t_a_x]

I was pointing out the hypocrisy and the double standard.

Twitter has been in the news cycle for censoring/manipulating tweets of Trump. On HN I see a lot of people defending this decision by noting they are a private company and you can switch social media services if you want.

It seems you cannot switch services, the mob will always find you and push their "ethics" and "facts" onto you.

[RNCTX]

Listed corporations are not "private companies."

They gave up privacy when they sold stock/bonds on public markets.

[s_y_n_t_a_x]

Twitter is a publicly listed corporation as well (since 2013) so that argument makes no sense:

https://thenextweb.com/twitter/2013/11/07/twitter-just-becam...

Either way, that's a strange moral line to take on all of this, whether a company is public or not.

[RNCTX]

Yes, they are.

There's nothing strange about it at all. If you want to sell securities on public markets you have to abide by certain rules. It's completely reasonable, and I know that corporations and their apologists like to throw around "private" as a buzzword and pretend like they should have free reign, but they do not.

There is no such thing as a "private" publicly traded company.