| > I'm not making a case. That much is clear. > I'm describing the state of the reddit culture. Whether you believe it or not, is incidental. Very convincing. Oh, I know, you don't care about that in the least. > Your statements were broader than that. Revisionism aside... No, they weren't. You stated that the subreddits are ultimately controlled by the site owners, and I explained that the site owners don't ban people based on race and gender. Simple. Revisionism indeed. > Making statements about YOUR gender (or a number of other attributes) can also get you banned. Here, I'll do a google search for you The results of the google search does not support the claim you're making, like, not even a single result. Beyond that, mods can ban users for whatever reason they want, but the site owners do not ban people based on their race and gender, that claim is totally false. > You aren't informed enough to be discussing this and it's not worth rehashing. lol, a laughable assertion coming from someone who can't even cherry-pick google search results to support their argument. Stop wasting my time. |
Not cherry picking to make an observation that documents the history. Its an ongoing, and well covered, topic for which you can demonstrably research without difficulty. Denial doesnt help either of us and causes me to question your sincerity. Good luck with whatever.