[coldcode]

Likely it means that big cities would get all the reps and the rest of the state gets nothing.

[jgeada]

As that is where most of the people live, why is it wrong? Why does largely unpopulated land get a vote?

[IgorPartola]

This. Why do voters living in rural areas get more weight to their votes? This is obviously more pronounced in the Senate, but clearly also a problem in the House.

[dhosek]

A better route would be proportional representation. You vote for a party-ranked list of candidates, and the top n% of the list gets into office based on the fraction of the vote the party received. Unlike single-member plurality voting, this makes third parties viable.