[nbroyal]

I think this is a bit disingenuous. I highly doubt Michigan's unions are fighting him tooth and nail on plans to lower taxes and ease the burden for smaller companies.

They are, however, fighting him on the ability to deploy to cities in financial disarray state appointed "emergency managers" who can override elected officials and, most importantly to the unions, cut union contracts. [1]

Now, you could argue that the emergency financial manager plan would eventually result in lower taxes and an easier path to success for smaller companies. You could also argue that there are better ways to achieve that same result rather than said plan.

[1] - http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/region/wayne_county/governor-ri...

[rmason]

I'm in Lansing and believe me they are fighting him, turning out thousands last week and briefly taking over the capital building. They did it with a phone bank from Washington DC (I received one of the calls as a former MEA member) and those arrested in the building were all from out of state.

What the proposed law does is give some bargaining strength to the state's beleagured cities and school boards. Unions are more likely to reach agreement when there's the threat of the governor appointing an emergency manager. I think the reality is that the governor won't use that power often. A large number of the city's in the state face bankruptcy and that's a lot more unpleasant outcome.

We are faced with some very unpleasant choices in the state. We're in trouble because previous governors from both parties kicked the can down the road with paper fixes. The governor is calling for shared sacrifice and those having to recieve less don't like it one bit.