|
|
|
|
|
|
by mbo
2196 days ago
|
|
|
Hey, same situation! As the resident rabid FP evangelist at work, people are often surprised by how much I like like TypeScript. Personally, I think structural typing systems are the path forward for functional languages, and that means accepting that Haskell needs to go to move on to a retirement home. I was pleasantly surprised by how well Scala did subtyping with ZIO's `Has` + variance annotations. Shame TypeScript is bivariant with function parameters. |
|
|